Camping tents · Review
Marmot Tungsten 4 Tent Review (Bought & Tested!)
I bought this tent with my own money and put it through 12 hands-on tests.
- Setup 11.75 min
- Peak 52.25in
- Inner area 51.2 sq ft
- Vestibule 34 sq ft

This page contains affiliate links, and that means that I may earn a commission if you buy something, at no extra cost to you. You can find my full disclosure policy here.
Test scorecard · scored against other camping tents
The Marmot Tungsten 4 weighs the least per person of the 8 camping tents I’ve ranked, and its 2 top poles give you lots of livable space. However, for an expensive tent, I didn’t expect its poles to crack on me after just a few uses.
- The lightest tent per person
- More livable space
- Poles can be significantly thicker
- Expensive
If you prefer watching to reading, my video review of this tent is coming soon.
See the 12 tests
In the Box
- Tent body
- Rainfly
- Footprint
- 3 poles
- Pole bag
- 8 stakes
- Stake bag
- Repair splint
- 4 guylines
- Carry bag

- Poles 31 orange X-pole, 2 short blue ones
- Stakes 8
- Guylines 4
Set Up & Pack Away
Both the setup and pack away were easy and relatively fuss-free, except for the X-pole popping out a few times during each setup.
Now, here’s what to take note of.
- Set-up time 11.75 minOn my own
- Pack-away time 10.75 min
Pro tip The 8 provided stakes only cover the tent base and two vestibules. I’d recommend buying an extra 6 stakes and 2 short guylines so you can stake down the widths and guy the tent out properly.
Peak Height
- Peak height 52.25inAt the center of the tent

That isn’t the highest peak I’ve measured, but it was more than enough for me.

Livable Space
The two short blue poles across the top are what carry the height outwards. They extend the peak height further across the tent than any of the other tents I’ve tested.

- Extreme left 46.25in
- Extreme right 47.0in
- Back of the tent 40.25in
- Front of the tent 40.0in

Base Area
- Floor area 51.2 sq ft
- Floor size 91 x 81inLength across the tent, then the width

- Single pads 42 doubles, side by side
- Exped Duo 74 x 43in
- Klymit Double V 74 x 47in
- Leftover space 8inAt the front, for gear

That means four of you sleep shoulder to shoulder, and there isn’t much room left over when you sit up.


Alternatively, a queen air bed fits, and it leaves enough room leftover for a single regular pad.
- Queen beds 1Etekcity, 80 x 59in
- Leftover space 21 x 10.5inLength, then width

Vestibules
- Vestibules 2One over each door
- Each vestibule 17.0 sq ft
- Both together 34.0 sq ft
- Size 45 x 91 x 36inShort edge, long edge, then depth
- Stakes 2 each


That’s bigger than the average 4-person vestibule. Even so, a chair and a table in there is a very tight squeeze, and I wouldn’t recommend it.

There are only two configurations, shut and open, and two toggles by the side hold it open.
- Vestibule zippers 2 per track
- Brand None

Doors
- Doors 2One under each vestibule
- Door size 45 x 32in

They look wide-mouthed, but they aren’t big. Getting in and out was easy enough as long as you don’t mind hunching. Zip slowly around the bend at the top, because that’s where they catch.
- Toggles 1 per door
- Door zippers 2 per door

Storage
- Pockets 6
- Corner pockets 4
- Lampshade pockets 2

- Corner pocket size 10inEach one is a double pocket
- Lampshade pocket size 8.5 x 7.5inTriangular
- Gear loops 5All closed felt loops

Ventilation
Take the rainfly off on a hot day and most of the inner tent is mesh.

- Mesh ~45%Across the whole inner tent
- Three walls ~40% each
- Fourth side ~80%The stargazing one


- Vents 2Both covered with mesh

Rain Protection
- Tub floor None
- Floor edge seams Taped
- Corner seams Taped
- Rainfly seams Taped

The taping stops at floor level, and nothing above it is taped.
The rainfly is full-coverage, and the widths get their own guy-out point.

I left the tent out in 1.5 hours of very heavy rain, with the vents open the whole time.


The corners held, and so did the vents, the mesh and the fabric. The rainfly was long enough to keep the rain off the inner tent.
The floor edge seams didn’t, and leaked a puddle of water in from the flooding test.

The underside of the rainfly was slightly damp as well, so the waterproof coating isn’t the best.

- My heavy rain test 1.5 hoursNo leaks except the floor edge seams
- Rainfly ~2-3 hoursBefore it wets through, from my longer roundup test
Quality
- Flooring 68D polyester taffetaThe footprint is another 68D
- Tent body 68D polyester ripstop
- Rainfly 68D polyester ripstop
- Poles Aluminum 9mmNot aircraft-grade, and not DAC

The poles are a lot thinner than I expected, and when the pole wasn’t fully seated during the setup, this segment cracked. That’s disappointing on a tent this expensive.

- Zippers Unbranded
- Mesh MicroSmaller holes than mosquito netting
- Guylines ShockcordWith an easy tensioner and reflective guy-outs
- Stakes Shepherd-hook
- Made in Vietnam

The stitching is good all around the tent. I found small rips in one part of the flooring after a few trips.
Portability
- Weight 9.4 lbsEverything in the bag
- Packed size 24.5 x 11.25 x 7.5in
- Carry handles None


Pros, Cons, Recommendations
How does the Tungsten 4 compare to other 4-person tents? I averaged the figures from four much less expensive ones I’ve tested: the Teton Mountain Ultra 4, the ALPS Mountaineering Lynx 4, the Kelty Wireless 4 and the Coleman Sundome 4.
| Test | Tungsten 4 | Average 4P tent |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | ✗ 11.75 mins | 9.25 mins |
| Pack away | ✗ 10.75 mins | 9.0 mins |
| Setup details | ✓ More | Less |
| Peak height | ✗ 52.25in | 57.0in |
| Top poles | ✓ 2 | 0-1 |
| Vertical walls | ✓ 2 | 0-2 |
| Inner area | ✗ 51.2 sq. ft. | 57.7 sq. ft. |
| Vestibule area | ✓ 34.0 sq. ft. | 25.0 sq. ft. |
| Total base area | ✓ 85.2 sq. ft. | 82.7 sq. ft. |
| Doors | ✓ 2 | 1.75 |
| Pockets | 4+2 | 4 |
| Rain test | 1 hour | 1 hour |
| Flooring | 68D Polyester taffeta | 75D Polyester taffeta |
| Footprint | ✓ Yes | No |
| Canopy/Rainfly | ✓ 68D Polyester ripstop | 68D-75D polyester |
| Poles | Aluminum | Fiberglass/Aluminum |
| Weight | ✓ 9.4lbs. | 10.5lbs. |
So, what are the pros and cons, and would I recommend the Marmot Tungsten 4?
More setup details
- Tungsten 4: 2 top poles + rainfly grommets, color-coding
- Average 4P tent: 0-1 top poles
More livable space
- Tungsten 4: 2 top poles = 2 vertical walls
- Average 4P tent: 0-1 top poles = 0-2 vertical walls
Poles can be significantly thicker
- Tungsten 4: 9mm aluminum
- Average 4P tent: Fiberglass or aluminum
I didn’t like the X-pole either. It pops out of the grommets more often than two separate poles would, and one segment cracked on me after I put it back in without seating it fully.
Expensive
Its MSRP is almost double that of the cheaper 4-person tents I compared it against.
Overall recommendation
Add up the setup details, the top poles, the livable space, the slightly bigger base area and the better materials, and the Marmot Tungsten 4 gives you maybe a 10-20% boost over the average 4-person tent. I don’t think that’s worth almost double the price, so I’d wait for a sale. If it’s the small packed size you’re after, the Mountain Hardwear Mineral King 3 packs down smaller for less.
Bonus – MUST Read!
I put every camping tent I own through the same tests, and my Best Camping Tents article ranks them against each other.
Or, check out the Marmot Tungsten 4:
Every figure above is from my own testing — measured by hand, bought with my own money.