Coleman tents · Vs review
Coleman Montana Tent V.S. Red Canyon Tent (I Bought BOTH!)
Both 8-person, both about $150, run through 12 side-by-side tests.
This page contains affiliate links, and that means that I may earn a commission if you buy something, at no extra cost to you. You can find my full disclosure policy here.
The short answer
Red Canyon for space. Montana for the porch and the hinged door.
The Red Canyon has 37 more square feet of floor (140.6 against 103.5), half as much ventilation again, 2 room dividers, a gear loft and a clothesline — and it's lighter and packs smaller. The Montana answers with a front porch, a proper hinged door and an e-port, none of which the Red Canyon has. I prefer the Red Canyon, mostly for that base area — but its rainfly poles are narrow, and one snapped on me.
Side by side
Where they actually differ
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| My score | 6.8 / 10 | 7.2 / 10 |
| Set up (1 person) | 22 minutes2 door poles + a rainfly pole | 20.5 minutes |
| Take down | 14.5 minutes | 14 minutes |
| Expandable carry bag | YesRip out the bottom strip | NoBut the bag is thicker and better made |
| Peak height | 74 inches | 73 inches |
| Length x width | 15 ft 4 in x 6 ft 9 in | 16 ft 4 in x 9 ft 7 in |
| Base area | 103.5 square feet8 pads, nothing spare | 140.6 square feet8 pads plus gear — or 10 pads |
| Queen beds | 3 | 3 |
| Front porch | Yes103 x 32 inches | No |
| Hinged door | YesHandles inside and out | NoZips and 2 latches |
| Room dividers | 0 | 2No zip through — you climb over |
| Pockets / lantern loops | 2 / 1 | 2 / 1 |
| Gear lofts | 0 | 1 |
| E-port | 1 | 0 |
| Clothesline | 0 | 1My only Coleman tent with one |
| Hot day ventilation | ~2,200 square inches3 smallish windows | ~3,300 square inchesCeiling mesh + 4 windows |
| Vents | 0 | 3All pretty tiny |
| Rain test | About 15 minutes | About 15 minutes |
| Weight | 23.4 pounds | 20.2 pounds |
| Packed size | 26 x 15 x 12 inchesAbout 30% bigger | 26 x 13 x 10 inches |
| What I paid | About $150 | About $150 |
✓ = the better result, from my own testing of both tents. Both leak at about 15 minutes because Coleman inverts its seams instead of taping them; seal them and either should manage a couple of hours of heavy rain.
Which applies to you?
Get this one if…
Get the Red Canyon if…
- You want the space — 140.6 square feet, 37 more than the Montana.
- You want ventilation: ~3,300 square inches against ~2,200.
- You want the gear loft, the clothesline and the 2 dividers.
- You'll pack a couple of pole splints — its fly poles are narrow.
Get the Montana if…
- You want the front porch — 103 by 32 inches of shade.
- You want the hinged door, with handles inside and out.
- You need an e-port; the Red Canyon has none.
- You want a carry bag you can expand when repacking.

Set Up & Take Down
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Set up (1 person) | 22 minutes | 20.5 minutes |
| Take down | 14.5 minutes | 14 minutes |
| Extra poles | 32 for the hinged door, 1 for the rainfly | 0 |
Within a couple of minutes of each other. The Montana's extra time is all poles: two fiberglass poles for the hinged D-door (one for the straight side, one for the curved), plus a rainfly pole that goes into a sleeve, gets four Velcro attachments, then has to be bent, secured at both ends, s-hooked and staked out.


Carry Bag
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Expandable | YesRip out the bottom strip | No |
| Bag quality | Standard | Thicker, better made |
A genuine trade. The Montana's bag expands if you rip the strip out of the bottom, which makes repacking easy. The Red Canyon's doesn't — odd — so fold it neatly. But its bag is the better-made one.


Spaciousness
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Peak height | 74 inches | 73 inches |
| Shape | Extended domePeak at the centre only | Extended domePeak at the centre only |
| Length x width | 15 ft 4 in x 6 ft 9 in | 16 ft 4 in x 9 ft 7 in |
| Base area | 103.5 square feet | 140.6 square feet37 sq ft more |
| Sleeping pads | 8No room spare | 8 plus gearOr about 10 pads |
An inch apart at the peak, and both are extended domes, so the height is only at the centre — three small steps in either and my head is in the ceiling mesh.
The floors are nothing alike. The Montana takes eight pads side by side with nothing left over; the Red Canyon takes the same eight with room at the sides for gear, or roughly two more pads.


Front Porch
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Front porch | Yes103 inches long, 32 inches wide | No |
Montana only, and I like it more than I expected. It shades a decent area, so gear can live out there — it kept my flip flops cool instead of superheating them.

Door
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Doors | 1 | 1 |
| Hinged | YesHandles inside and out | No |
| Holding it open | Push it behind the fiberglass pole | 2 door latches |
The Montana's hinged D-door is the best door on either tent — handles on both sides, no zips to fumble with, and it stays open if you push it behind the black fiberglass pole. The Red Canyon is zips and two latches.


Room Dividers
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Room dividers | 0 | 2One at each side |
| Middle section fits | — | 4 pads or 2 doubles |
| Behind each divider | — | 1 double or 2 padsNo queen — minimal space |
| Zip through the divider | — | NoUnlatch and climb over |
The Red Canyon has them and the Montana doesn't, so the point goes to the Red Canyon — but I'm not a huge fan of how they work. The space behind each divider is minimal, and there's no zip down the middle, so getting from one room to the next means taking a latch down and climbing over. Not user-friendly.

Storage
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Pockets | 2 | 2 |
| Lantern loops | 1 | 1 |
| Gear lofts | 0 | 1 |
| Clothesline | 0 | 1Pre-attached |
| E-port | 1Zippered closure | 0 |
Same pockets and loops. The Red Canyon adds a gear loft and a pre-attached clothesline — the only Coleman tent I own that has one. The Montana takes back the e-port, which the Red Canyon lacks entirely.


Hot Day Ventilation
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Window ventilation | ~2,200 square inchesTwo-thirds of the Red Canyon | ~3,300 square inches |
| Windows | 3Not very big | 4Plus ceiling mesh |
| Ceiling mesh | Yes | Yes |
I take the rainfly off and measure the mesh. The Red Canyon comes out at about 3,300 square inches against the Montana's 2,200 — two-thirds as much. The Montana would be much better with one more window on its blank wall.


Rainy Day Ventilation
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Vents | 0 | 3All pretty tiny |
| Windows openable in rain | 0 | 0 |
Neither does well here. The Red Canyon has three vents, but they're small enough that it hardly matters. The Montana has none at all — no window opens in rain and there is no vent to fall back on — so the point still goes to the Red Canyon.


Rain Test
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first leak | About 15 minutes | About 15 minutes |
| Where it leaked | The widths — no rainfly over them | The front — very short rainfly |
| Why | Inverted seams, not taped | Inverted seams, not taped |
A dead heat, and the same root cause. The Montana's rainfly looks long but doesn't cover the tent's widths at all, and that's where it went first. The Red Canyon's fly extends at the sides but is very short at the front, and that's where it went first.
Both leak because Coleman inverts its seams rather than taping them. Seal them and either tent should last a couple of hours in heavy rain.


Weight & Packed Size
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 23.4 pounds | 20.2 pounds |
| Packed size | 26 x 15 x 12 inchesAbout 30% bigger | 26 x 13 x 10 inches |
The bigger tent is the lighter, smaller one — three pounds down and about 30% less packed bulk.

Price
| Measured (8-person) | Montana | Red Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| What I paid | About $150 | About $150 |
The same, near enough — and genuinely affordable for an 8-person family tent.
My recommendation
Both are great value family tents at around $150. But if I had to pick one, I prefer the Red Canyon, and the biggest reason is that base area: 37 square feet more than the Montana, and almost as big as my WeatherMaster 10 (143.6 sq ft) or my Instant Cabin 10 (135.7 sq ft). It also ventilates better on hot days and rainy ones, and it brings 2 dividers, a gear loft and a clothesline.
The Montana keeps the things I genuinely miss on the Red Canyon: the front porch, the e-port, and that hinged D-door, which I like a lot.
One warning on the Red Canyon — its rainfly fiberglass poles are narrow, and one of mine snapped on first use. Bring a couple of tent repair pole splints; they cost a few dollars, so it's not a dealbreaker, but don't find out the hard way.
In short: more space, go Red Canyon. Less space but a porch, a hinged door and an e-port, go Montana. Full reviews: the Montana 8 and the Red Canyon 8.
Bonus: To see how the Montana and Red Canyon compare against my 12 other Coleman tents, read the post where I bought and tested the 14 best Coleman tents.
Every figure on this page comes from my own measurements of the tents I bought and tested.


