Lantern flashlights · Vs review

Goal Zero Micro Charge V.S. Micro Flash (I Bought & Tested Both!)

Two Goal Zero lantern flashlights, run side by side through 7 head-to-head tests.

This page contains affiliate links, and that means that I may earn a commission if you buy something, at no extra cost to you. You can find my full disclosure policy here.

My overall pick
The author's Goal Zero Micro Charge.

Goal Zero Micro ChargeThe one I'd buy

6.9/ 10
  • Power2,600 mAh
  • Lantern265 lumens
  • Flashlight60 lumens
  • Run-time274 hrs
Runner-up
The author's Goal Zero Micro Flash.

Goal Zero Micro FlashThe lighter one

6.8/ 10
  • Power2,600 mAh
  • Lantern209 lumens
  • Flashlight99 lumens
  • Run-time353 hrs

The short answer

Get the Micro Charge. For about $5 more you get a USB port that charges your phone, and everything else is much the same.

The Goal Zero Micro Charge took my iPhone 12 from 17% to 85% on one full battery, and it throws in a lightweight carabiner that the Goal Zero Micro Flash doesn't have. The Micro Flash answers on two things: it saves you 0.28oz, and it's usually the cheaper of the two. Unless weight or budget is what decides it, that extra $5 buys you a phone charger. They score 6.9 against 6.8, so this isn't about which one is better built. One thing to know before the numbers: Goal Zero rates these two identically on lighting, so the lumen and run-time gaps below are the difference between my two units, not between the models.

Side by side

Where they actually differ

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
Mobile charging (USB output)Yes, 5V and 1ANone
iPhone 12, from one full battery68%17% to 85%, in 1 hr 35 min
In the boxThe light and a lightweight carabinerJust the light
Hanging it off a closed loopYes, with the carabinerNo, and the hook doesn't come off
Recharge time at 5V, 1A4 hrs 39 min3 hrs 36 min
Full lantern on High265 lumens209 lumens
Half lantern on High242 lumens142 lumens
Flashlight on High60 lumensBounced off a wall99 lumensBounced off a ceiling
Flashlight on Low, run time239 hrs308 hrs
Full lantern on Low, run time229 hrs288 hrs
Half lantern on Low, run time274 hrs353 hrs
Lantern shine distance on High4.31ft4.09ft
Flashlight beam distance on High25.4ft24.5ft
Weight3.03oz2.75oz0.28oz lighter
Packed length4.4inAbout 18% longer3.74in
PriceUsually about $5 moreThe cheaper of the two

✓ = the better result, from my own testing. Shared: both hold a 2,600 mAh cell · both arrive in demo mode · both run flashlight, full lantern, then half lantern off one button, with press-and-hold dimming and no memory setting · both have 4 battery indicator lights that read well above what's actually left · both are rated IPX6, and both came out of my water jets at a tested IPX5 · both take drops from hand height without a scratch · both charge and light at the same time · both are high-grade plastic, designed in the USA and made in China · both carry a 2-year warranty · and on the three High modes their run times land within half an hour of each other. Goal Zero rates both lights at the same 10 to 150 lumens with the same quoted run times, so every lighting and battery figure here is the difference between my two units, not between the models.

Which applies to you?

Get this one if…

Get the Micro Charge if…

  • You want the phone charger. It gave my iPhone 12 68% off one full battery, and 60% to 70% across repeat tests.
  • You hang your light off closed loops, because the carabiner in the box does what the fixed hook can't.
  • The extra $5 and 0.28oz aren't what decides it for you.

Get the Micro Flash if…

  • Weight is the deciding factor: 2.75oz against 3.03, and 3.74in long against 4.4.
  • Budget is the deciding factor, because it's usually about $5 cheaper.
  • You don't need the charging output, which is the only thing the Micro Charge really adds.
  • Just know what you give up: no USB output port, and no carabiner in the box.
The author's Goal Zero Micro Charge and Goal Zero Micro Flash.
My Micro Flash on the left, my Micro Charge on the right. The extra length is the charging port.
Video: Goal Zero Micro Charge vs Goal Zero Micro Flash

If you prefer watching to reading, check out my video here instead.

Mobile Charging

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
USB output portYes, USB-A at the baseNone
Output5V, 1A
iPhone 12, from one full battery68%17% to 85%, in 1 hr 35 min
Across repeat tests60% to 70%

The Micro Charge has a second USB port at its base, so your phone cable plugs straight in and it doubles as a power bank.

The USB-A output port on the Goal Zero Micro Charge.
The second port at the base is the one thing the Micro Flash doesn't have.
The author measuring the charging output of the Goal Zero Micro Charge with a USB meter.
My phone was pulling 4.87 volts and 0.96 amps out of it.

I redid that test a few times from roughly the same starting charge, and it never came out under 60%. A 2,600 mAh cell should really only give my iPhone 12 a little over half, going by the other lights I've tested. The Torch 500 holds double that.

The Micro Flash has no output port at all, so it can't do any of this.

In The Box & The Hook

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
In the boxThe light and a lightweight carabinerJust the light
HookFixed, clips to either sideFixed, clips to either side
Open lantern loopsYesYes
Closed loopsYes, with the carabinerNo, not without your own carabiner

Both lights turn up in demo mode, cycling through the modes on their own until you plug them into a USB port once.

After that the only difference in the box is the carabiner. The Micro Charge comes with a lightweight one, and the Micro Flash comes with nothing but the Flash.

The Goal Zero Micro Charge hanging from its hook.
The Micro Charge on its hook, which clips to either side.
The non-removable hook on top of the Goal Zero Micro Flash.
The Micro Flash's hook is identical, and just as fixed.

That matters more than it sounds, because the hook is the same on both and neither one comes off. A fixed hook only goes onto open lantern loops, so a closed loop needs a carabiner. With the Micro Flash you'd have to buy your own.

Charging Input

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
Charging portBuilt-in USB-ABuilt-in USB-A
Charge time at 5V, 1A4 hrs 39 min3 hrs 36 min

Neither of these needs a cable. The plug folds out of the base on both, and both take the same 5V, 1A input.

The built-in USB input at the bottom of the Goal Zero Micro Charge.
The Micro Charge's plug, folded out of the base.
The built-in USB input at the bottom of the Goal Zero Micro Flash.
The same plug on the Micro Flash, and it's the quicker of the two to fill.

That's about an hour of difference off the very same port, against the 3.5 hours Goal Zero quotes for both of them.

Both plugs are a little short, too. If your USB port is recessed the plug won't reach, and I had to use a separate head on both of mine.

Lighting Output

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
Full lantern on High265 lumens209 lumens
Half lantern on High242 lumens142 lumens
Flashlight on High60 lumensBounced off a wall99 lumensBounced off a ceiling
Every Low mode0 lumens0 lumens

Take note: Goal Zero quotes both lights at exactly the same 10 to 150 lumens, so this table is the difference between my two units, not between the models. Buy either one and you may well measure something else.

Goal Zero quotes both at 10 to 150 lumens depending on the mode, so on paper these are the same light. My two weren't, and that is the single most important thing on this page.

The Micro Charge is the brighter lantern by a long way, and the gap is widest on the half lantern.

The author measuring the lumen output of the Goal Zero Micro Charge with a lux meter.
The Micro Charge's full lantern on High, read off a lux meter at a fixed distance.
The Goal Zero Micro Flash in full lantern mode with all four LEDs lit.
The Micro Flash's full lantern on High, all 4 LEDs lit.

The Micro Flash is the stronger flashlight of the two. Do bear in mind that I bounced the Flash off a ceiling and the Charge off a wall, so those two figures aren't measured quite the same way.

The author running a bounce test on the Goal Zero Micro Charge flashlight.
I read the Micro Charge's High mode off a wall, 19.7in out.
The Goal Zero Micro Flash flashlight on High, lighting a dark trail.
The Micro Flash on High, thrown down a dark trail.

Every Low mode on both lights is a zero-lumen night light.

None of this is a difference between the Micro Charge and the Micro Flash as models, though. It's a difference between the two that landed on my doorstep, and the LEDs vary enough from unit to unit that yours could go the other way.

Run Times

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
Flashlight on High7.5 hrs8 hrs
Flashlight on Low239 hrs308 hrs
Full lantern on High7.5 hrs7.25 hrs
Full lantern on Low229 hrs288 hrs
Half lantern on High14.1 hrs14.1 hrs
Half lantern on Low274 hrs353 hrs

Take note: same caveat as the lumens. Goal Zero quotes identical run times for both, so this gap is my two units, not the two models.

I ran every mode on both lights down to flat and timed it. They hold the same 2,600 mAh cell and Goal Zero quotes them the same, so the numbers should have matched.

On the three High modes they effectively do, landing within half an hour of each other.

The Goal Zero Micro Charge in half lantern mode.
The half lantern on the Micro Charge, with 2 of the 4 LEDs off.
The Goal Zero Micro Flash in half lantern mode with two LEDs lit.
The same mode on the Micro Flash, where the run-time gap is biggest.

On the dim modes the Micro Flash ran about 30% longer on every single test.

That is the same story as the lumens, and it points the same way. Battery capacity varies from unit to unit, so a 30% gap between my two lights is not a 30% gap between the models. Don't buy the Micro Flash expecting 353 hours because I got them.

Weight & Packed Size

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
Weight3.03oz2.75oz0.28oz lighter
Packed length4.4in3.74in
Width across the head1.5in1.5in

The Micro Charge is the heavier and the longer of the two, and the extra length is where the USB output port sits.

The heads are identical, so all of that difference is in the barrel.

The author measuring the packed size of the Goal Zero Micro Charge.
4.4in, and it runs the length of my hand.
The author measuring the packed size of the Goal Zero Micro Flash.
3.74in on the Micro Flash, about the length of my palm.

Both of them still sit comfortably along my palm, so this is a difference you'd feel in a pack rather than in your hand.

Waterproofing & Drop Testing

MeasuredMicro ChargeMicro Flash
Official IP ratingIPX6IPX6
Heavy rain30 min, no issues25 min, no issues
Water jetsIndicator lights stuck on afterwardsIndicator lights stuck on afterwards
My tested IP ratingIPX5IPX5
Drops from hand heightNo damageNo damage

Both are rated IPX6, and both came through heavy rain fine. I gave the Micro Charge 30 minutes of it and the Micro Flash 25, straight into the open plug, and every mode still worked afterwards.

The Goal Zero Micro Charge under water jets.
Ten minutes of jets on the Micro Charge, straight at the ports.
The Goal Zero Micro Flash soaked after 25 minutes of heavy rain.
Twenty-five minutes of heavy rain on the Micro Flash.

The water jets are where they both fell over. Ten minutes of those and the battery indicator lights stopped turning off on both of them, and they have stayed that way since.

The battery indicator lights of the Goal Zero Micro Charge stuck on after the water jets.
Every mode still works. The indicator lights just won't turn off anymore.

So I rate both at a tested IPX5 rather than the IPX6 on the box. My best guess is the exposed USB ports, where water gets in and never comes back out.

Drops are a happier story. I've dropped both from hand height plenty of times now and neither has a scratch on it.

My recommendation

I'd go with the Goal Zero Micro Charge over the Goal Zero Micro Flash. The mobile charging comes in handy in a pinch, and it comes with a lightweight carabiner that the Flash doesn't have.

Everything else is much the same, and the price increase is usually only about $5. It took my iPhone 12 from 17% to 85% on one full battery, and I got 60% to 70% out of it across repeat tests.

The only reason I'd go with the Micro Flash is if you need to save that 0.28oz, or you don't need the charging output.

And the caveat that runs through this whole page: Goal Zero rates both lights identically on lumens and run times, and my two didn't come out identical. Manufacturing differences in the LEDs and the battery are enough that even on the same model you may not get what I measured, so pick on the charging port and the carabiner rather than on my lighting numbers.

Bonus: I bought and tested 7 lantern flashlights against each other, with lux-meter readings, run-times down to flat, and rain and water-jet tests. Both of these are in there, in my Best Lantern Flashlights article.

Every figure on this page comes from my own testing of the two lights I bought.

Similar Posts