The 7 Best Camping Fans (Bought & Tested!)
I bought and tested these 7 best camping fans for this review:
Claymore V600+
Nitecore NEF10
Geek Aire 10-inch
O2Cool Treva
Coleman OneSource
Odoland Fan
Coleman CPX 6
Here, you’ll find everything you need to know about each of them.
This page contains affiliate links, and that means that I may earn a commission if you buy something, at no extra cost to you. You can find my full disclosure policy here.
Best Camping Fans – Quick Summary
Here’s a quick summary of the best camping fans that I recommend:
Camping Fan | Recommendation | Score | Price |
---|---|---|---|
BEST OVERALL Claymore V600+ Fan
|
|||
BEST FAN + LANTERN Nitecore NEF10 Fan
|
|||
BEST FOR GROUPS Geek Aire Portable Fan
|
|||
BUDGET PICK Odoland Camp Fan
|
These 7 camping fans set me back by around $300 (yes, I actually buy each fan with my own savings), and I also spent about 2 months testing all of them out.
If you prefer to watch my YouTube video instead of reading this blog post, I’ll embed it here for you:
If you prefer reading, let’s get into the more detailed recommendations in the rest of this post.
1. Claymore V600+ Camp Fan (Overall Best)
Key Info
Power source: 7,800 mAh rechargeable battery
Max wind speed: 4.2 m/s (13.7 ft/s)
Blade diameter: 6.0 inches
Max run-time: 31.5 hours
Lighting: None
Weight: 20.6 ounces
Packed size: 7.25 x 7.75 x 5.5 in
Pros and Cons
Summary
My top pick is easily the Claymore V600+ camping fan.
Here are all the test scores for each camping fan, and the Claymore came in first with the best overall score, with no scores in red at all:
One of its strongest points (see the wind test above) is its impressive range of wind speeds, allowing you to choose between maximum cooling or optimizing run-time.
Here are the four wind speed settings the Claymore has:
High: 4.2 m/s
Medium: 3.8 m/s
Low: 3.1 m/s
Ultra-Low: 2.6 m/s
The Claymore also has many features, such as a hanging hook, adjustable legs, a tripod thread, battery lights, a sleep timer, fan rotation, and a removable cage.
It is, however, missing two features – a lighting function, and a mobile charging option.
If you don’t need both the lighting and mobile charging, the Claymore V600+ is a great pick.
If you need the mobile charging function though, you’re in luck, because the updated Claymore V1040 has that.
And if you need both functions (lighting and charging), the next camping fan (the Nitecore NEF10) would be a much better option for you.
Check out the Claymore V600+:
There’s an updated version here (V1040):
2. Nitecore NEF10 (Best Tent Fan with Light)
Key Info
Power source: 10,000 mAh rechargeable battery
Max wind speed: 4.2 m/s (13.7 ft/s)
Blade diameter: 5.25 inches
Max run-time: 32.0 hours
Lighting: Lantern (34-124 lumens)
Weight: 23.0 ounces
Packed size: 7 x 7 x 4.5 inches
Pros and Cons
Summary
My runner-up pick is the Nitecore NEF10 camping fan, and it scored just 0.1 point less than the Claymore. Here are some of the ways that it’s better than the Claymore.
First, the Nitecore has the best run-time of all my rechargeable fans. In fact, the run time is almost as good as a fan running on four D-batteries. How impressive is that? Here’s the data:
Camping Fan | Wind Speed | Run-Time | Power Source |
---|---|---|---|
Coleman CPX 6 | 2.8m/s | 35.0 hours | D batteries x 4 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 2.7m/s | 32.0 hours | 10,000 mAh battery |
Comparing the Nitecore’s rechargeable battery to 4 x D cells.
Second, the Nitecore also has a surprisingly quiet operation; it’s highest fan speed is the quietest of all my camping fans:
Highest fan speed (4.2 m/s): 56 dBA
Off: 41 dBA
Third, the Nitecore is also a shockingly feature-rich fan, with:
A hanging hook and carabiner (to use as a ceiling fan)
Adjustable legs
360-degree rotation from the ball-head tripod
A removable cage
A sleep timer
A power bank function (which gave me about 3 x 60+% charges of my iPhone 12)
A lantern function
(The Claymore doesn’t have the last 2 functions – mobile charging and lantern.)
The lantern function has 3 different modes for a decent amount of versatility:
Low: 34 lumens
Medium: 71 lumens
High: 124 lumens
The high mode was plenty for reading and playing cards in the tent, and the low mode was a great night light.
And fourth, I paid 50% less for the Nitecore NEF10 than I did for my Claymore V600+, making this incredible value for money, if the Claymore is out of your budget.
However, the biggest con of the Nitecore is that the fan stopped working after I put it through 30 minutes of heavy rain.
Update: Four months of drying later, the fan function has come back to life! The sleep timer is still not working though.
As long as you don’t leave your fan in the rain, I think the Nitecore NEF10 is a fantastic value for money pick – affordable, high quality, with loads of features.
Check out the Nitecore NEF10:
3. Geek Aire Rechargeable Fan (Best for Groups)
Key Info
Power source: 6,000 mAh rechargeable battery
Max wind speed: 3.9 m/s (12.8 ft/s)
Blade diameter: 8.5 inches
Max run-time: 29.5 hours
Lighting: None
Weight: 61.7 ounces
Packed size: 14 x 12 x 5.5 inches
Pros and Cons
Summary
The Claymore and Nitecore are smaller 6 to 7-inch fans, while the Geek Aire Rechargeable Fan comes in at a minimum of 10 inches. (Take note that the blade diameter – 8.5in – is smaller than the marketed fan diameter – 10 inches.)
This is usually enough to cool 2 people down, and you also have the option to choose 12 or 16-inch fans as well:
- Geek Aire 10-Inch
- Geek Aire 12-Inch (Most Popular)
- Geek Aire 16-Inch
Because the blade diameter is so much wider, it actually pushes a lot more air despite having lower max fan speeds. I really loved the refreshing breeze of this powerful fan.
On top of that, the airflow distance with the Geek Aire is the best, coming in at 108 inches, which can be used in a 4 to 5-person tent.
Also, it is the only camping fan that I have that’s made out of metal, the rest are mostly plastic fans. And it’s one of the two fans in this review that have an IPX4 waterproof rating.
So, it was able to take my 30-minute heavy rain test with no issues at all.
I also love that the adjustment knob gives you complete control over what fan speed you want, ranging from 1.6 m/s to 3.9 m/s. It’s the only fan I have that has this; the rest in this review have discrete fan speeds (low, medium, high, etc.).
However, for such a big fan, the battery capacity can be larger. It’s lower than both the Claymore and the Nitecore!
And it doesn’t have a sleep timer to conserve battery, nor does it have lighting or mobile charging functions.
Overall, it’s not the most feature-rich, but the Geek Aire Fan does pretty good with the features that it does have, and is still a great camping fan.
Check out the Geek Aire:
4. Odoland Camping Fan (Super Cheap Pick)
Key Info
Power source: D batteries x 2
Max wind speed: 3.6 m/s (11.8 ft/s)
Blade diameter: 4.0 inches
Max run-time: 40.0 hours
Lighting: Lantern (398 lumens)
Weight: 23.6 ounces
Packed size: 5.75 x 5.75 x 7.5 inches
Pros and Cons
Summary
If you’re looking for a super cheap camping fan pick, there’s probably no better option than the Odoland camping fan.
And if you’re looking for a fan-and-lantern combo, you’re in luck, because the Odoland comes equipped with a 398-lumen super-glaring lantern, which can light up an entire 6-person tent:
However, I’m not a big fan of the Odoland because it runs on two D batteries each time. I much prefer using a rechargeable fan, because this gets really expensive in the long run.
On top of that, it doesn’t have a lot of pros. Here are some cons that I didn’t quite like:
Small blade diameter (4 inches)
A little noisy
Plastic used is a little lower-quality
Not great in the rain (lighting function stopped working after 30 minutes of heavy rain)
But I do think that ultimately, you get what you pay for – a functional fan for less than $20.
Overall, I’d recommend this Odoland camping fan only if you have (1) no more than $20 to spend on a fan, and (2) a ton of spare D batteries to use up.
Otherwise, I’d save up a little bit of money to get the Nitecore NEF10 fan instead.
Check out the Odoland:
To recap, here are all the camping fans that I recommend:
- Best Overall: Claymore V600+ (Updated model: Claymore V1040)
- Best Fan With Lantern: Nitecore NEF10
- Best Value for Money: Nitecore NEF10
- Best Big Fan for Groups: Geek Aire Camp Fan
- Cheap Budget Pick: Odoland Camp Fan
Why You Should Trust Me
I personally buy each of these best camping fans with my own money (no free or sponsored gear posts), and test each one of them over months. (This review took 2 months to test and another 1.5 months to produce!)
I also run a YouTube channel with over 20,000 subscribers that focuses just on reviewing camping gear. It’s my jam 🙂
The Other Camping Fans I Tested
Above are the 4 recommended best camping fans. Here are 3 more that I tried and tested, but just didn’t make the cut:
O2Cool Treva: More of a RV-camping fan than a tent-camping fan. The base is small and isn’t the most stable on uneven ground.
Coleman OneSource: Would only recommend if you have other OneSource products from Coleman (they have interchangeable rechargeable batteries). Otherwise, it’s just an average fan that’s nothing spectacular.
Coleman CPX 6: The worst camping fan ever. Blades are made of foam, and don’t push enough air. Please avoid!
If you’re interested in how any of the above camping fans have performed, here are all my detailed reviews and testing data:
How I Tested My Camping Fans
I tested each of my best camping fans for wind power, run-time, noise level, features, durability and portability. Here are the results from each of the tests.
A. Wind Power Test
For this first wind power test, I looked at these three things:
Wind speed
Blade diameter
Airflow distance
For the wind speed, I purchased a mini anemometer, and used it to record the different wind speeds on each fan mode:
Camping Fan | Maximum Speed (m/s) | Minimum Speed (m/s) |
---|---|---|
Nitecore NEF10 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
Claymore V600+ | 4.2 | 2.6 |
Geek Aire Fan | 3.9 | 1.6 |
Coleman CPX6 | 3.7 | 2.8 |
Odoland Fan | 3.6 | 2.6 |
O2Cool Treva | 2.9 | 2.2 |
Coleman OneSource | 2.9 | 2.0 |
But wind speed isn’t the only thing you should look at. The blade diameter is equally important. Even if a camping fan has a low max speed, a bigger fan will move much more air than a tiny one.
Camping Fan | Blade Diameter (in) |
---|---|
O2Cool Treva | 9.25 |
Geek Aire Fan | 8.5 |
Coleman CPX6 | 7.5 |
Claymore V600+ | 6.0 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 5.25 |
Coleman OneSource | 5.0 |
Odoland Fan | 4.0 |
Now, to test for this airflow distance, I laid out a measuring tape diagonally across the tent, I stuck a windmill in front of each fan, then I recorded the distance that the windmill stopped spinning:
Camping Fan | Airflow Distance (in) | Tent Size |
---|---|---|
Geek Aire Fan | 108 | 5-person |
Claymore V600+ | 100 | 4-person |
Nitecore NEF10 | 95 | 4-person |
O2Cool Treva | 90 | 3-person |
Odoland Fan | 70 | 2-person |
Coleman OneSource | 66 | 2-person |
Coleman CPX6 | 5 | 0-person |
Based on all three mini-tests above, here’s how I rated the wind power for each fan:
Camping Fan | Wind Power Ratings |
---|---|
Geek Aire Fan | 9.3 |
Claymore V600+ | 9.0 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 8.3 |
O2Cool Treva | 7.7 |
Odoland Fan | 6.3 |
Coleman OneSource | 5.3 |
Coleman CPX6 | 3.3 |
B. Run-Time/Battery Life Test
The next test is the run-time/battery life test, which is how long each of these camping fans can last on a single charge.
So, what I did was to give each of these fans a full charge, and then I set them aside, while timing their run-times with a stopwatch.
Camping Fan | Max Run-Time (hours) | Min Run-Time (hours) |
---|---|---|
O2Cool Treva | 85.0 | 60.0 |
Odoland Fan | 40.0 | 21.0 |
Coleman CPX6 | 35.0 | 25.0 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 32.0 | 9.0 |
Claymore V600+ | 31.5 | 6.25 |
Geek Aire Fan | 29.5 | 6.0 |
Coleman OneSource | 17.5 | 5.75 |
Now, this may not be the fairest test on battery life, since different camping fans will run on different speeds.
So, I took a speed that’s as close as possible to 3 meters or 10 feet per second, so they range from 2.6 to 3.1 meters per second here, and then I took the run-time of that particular speed, and arranged them from longest run-time to shortest run-time:
Camping Fan | Wind Speed | Run-Time | Power Source |
---|---|---|---|
O2Cool Treva | 2.9m/s | 60.0 hours | 6 x D batteries |
Odoland Fan | 2.6m/s | 40.0 hours | 2 x D batteries |
Coleman CPX6 | 2.8m/s | 35.0 hours | 4 x D batteries |
Nitecore NEF10 | 2.7m/s | 32.0 hours | Rechargeable |
Claymore V600+ | 3.1m/s | 15.75 hours | Rechargeable |
Geek Aire Fan | 3.0m/s | 9.25 hours | Rechargeable |
Coleman OneSource | 2.8m/s | 5.75 hours | Rechargeable |
Take note here that the best camping fans that run on D batteries (an external power source) have longer battery lives (and hence longer run times) than rechargeable fans with a built-in rechargeable battery.
Based on the above, here’s how I rated the camping fans for their run-times:
Camping Fan | Run-Time Ratings |
---|---|
O2Cool Treva | 10 |
Odoland Fan | 9 |
Coleman CPX6 | 8 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 8 |
Claymore V600+ | 6 |
Geek Aire Fan | 6 |
Coleman OneSource | 5 |
C. Noise Level Test
The next test is how much noise each of the camping fans produce when they’re turned on. To test this, I got a mini sound meter.
The base sound level without any of the fans on, comes in at about 41 decibels.
Now, with each of the fans turned on, here are all my results:
Camping Fan | Slowest (dBA) | Fastest (dBA) |
---|---|---|
Nitecore NEF10 | 45 | 56 |
O2Cool Treva | 53 | 57 |
Claymore V600+ | 46 | 60 |
Coleman CPX6 | 55 | 61 |
Odoland Fan | 59 | 63 |
Geek Aire Fan | 42 | 66 |
Coleman OneSource | 55 | 67 |
And based on the sound levels above, here are each camping fan’s ratings:
Camping Fan | Noise Level Ratings |
---|---|
Nitecore NEF10 | 10 |
O2Cool Treva | 10 |
Claymore V600+ | 8 |
Coleman CPX6 | 8 |
Odoland Fan | 7 |
Geek Aire Fan | 5 |
Coleman OneSource | 5 |
D. Features Test
The next test is on the number of features each camping fan has, and I looked at:
Hanging hook
Legs/stand
Battery lights
Fan head rotation
Removable cage
Sleep timer
Lighting
Mobile charging / power bank function
Camping Fan | Hook | Legs/Stand | Battery Lights | Rotation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Claymore V600+ | Yes | Yes | Yes | 45° |
Nitecore NEF10 | Yes | Yes | No | 360° |
Geek Aire Fan | No | Yes | Yes | 360° |
Coleman OneSource | Yes | Yes | Yes | 180° |
O2Cool Treva | No | Yes | No | 0° |
Odoland Fan | Yes | Yes | No | 360° |
Coleman CPX6 | Yes | No | No | 0° |
Camping Fan | Removable Cage | Sleep Timer | Lighting Features | Mobile Charging |
---|---|---|---|---|
Claymore V600+ | Yes | Yes (1h, 2h, 3h, 4h) | No | No^ |
Nitecore NEF10 | Yes | Yes (1h, 3h, 5h) | Lantern (34-124 lumens) | Yes (10,000 mAh) |
Geek Aire Fan | Yes* | No | No | No |
Coleman OneSource | No | No | Flashlight (57 lumens) | Yes (4,800 mAh) |
O2Cool Treva | Yes* | No | No | No |
Odoland Fan | No | No | Lantern (398 lumens) | No |
Coleman CPX6 | No | No | Lantern (150-470 lumens) | No |
- *Technically removable, but requires a screwdriver and more time that I would have liked.
- ^No mobile charging for the V600+, but the updated V1040 has this function.
Based on everything above, here’s how I rated each of my camping fans for features:
Camping Fan | Features Ratings |
---|---|
Nitecore NEF10 | 9.4 |
Claymore V600+ | 8.4 |
Coleman OneSource | 7.8 |
Geek Aire Fan | 7.5 |
Coleman CPX6 | 7.3 |
Odoland Fan | 6.1 |
O2Cool Treva | 6.0 |
Update: I realized I didn’t test a stroller-fan function with foldable and adjustable legs. When I update this review in the future, I’ll try to include one.
E. Durability Test
The next test is durability, so I first put all my camping fans through half an hour of moderate rainfall, and checked each one after the test:
Camping Fan | IP Rating | Rain Test |
---|---|---|
Coleman OneSource | IPX4 | Passed |
Geek Aire Fan | IPX4 | Water leakage |
Coleman CPX6 | None | Water leakage |
Claymore V600+ | None | Water leakage |
O2Cool Treva | None | Water leakage |
Odoland Fan | None | Spoiled (Light) |
Nitecore NEF10 | None | Spoiled (Fan)* |
Note: *My Nitecore NEF10’s fan didn’t work after the rain test, but came back to life after 4 months.
I also looked at the main material each camping fan is made of, as well as the warranty length of each fan, and here are all the details that you need to know:
Camping Fan | Materials | Warranty |
---|---|---|
Geek Aire Fan | Metal | 1 year |
Coleman OneSource | Plastic | 3 years |
Nitecore NEF10 | Plastic | 1 year |
Coleman CPX6 | Plastic | 1 year |
Claymore V600+ | Plastic | 1 year |
O2Cool Treva | Plastic | None |
Odoland Fan | Plastic | None |
Based on everything I went through for this fifth durability test, so that’s the rain test, the materials, and the warranty, here’s how I rated each camping fan:
Camping Fan | Durability Ratings |
---|---|
Coleman OneSource | 8.0 |
Geek Aire Fan | 7.7 |
Claymore V600+ | 6.3 |
Coleman CPX6 | 5.3 |
O2Cool Treva | 4.3 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 3.3 |
Odoland Fan | 3.0 |
F. Portability Test
The next test is portability, and here’s a quick table showing you all the info that you need:
Camping Fan | Weight (oz) | Packed Size (in) | Disassembly? |
---|---|---|---|
Claymore V600+ | 20.6 | 7.25 x 7.75 x 5.5 | Yes |
Coleman OneSource | 22.4 | 7 x 7 x 11 | No |
Nitecore NEF10 | 23.0 | 7 x 7 x 4.5 | Yes |
Odoland Fan | 23.6 | 5.75 x 5.75 x 7.5 | No |
Coleman CPX6 | 45.2 | 10 x 9.5 x 5.75 | No |
Geek Aire Fan | 61.7 | 14 x 12 x 5.5 | No |
O2Cool Treva | 64.4 | 12 x 12.75 x 2.8 | No |
And here’s how I rated each of the camping fans for their portability:
Camping Fan | Portability Ratings |
---|---|
Claymore V600+ | 10 |
Nitecore NEF10 | 10 |
Coleman OneSource | 9 |
Odoland Fan | 9 |
Coleman CPX6 | 7 |
Geek Aire Fan | 5 |
O2Cool Treva | 5 |
Those are all the tests that I put my camp fans through. Now, to recap, here’s everything that I recommend:
- Best Overall: Claymore V600+ (Updated model: Claymore V1040)
- Best Fan With Lantern: Nitecore NEF10
- Best Value for Money: Nitecore NEF10
- Best Big Fan for Groups: Geek Aire Camp Fan
- Cheap Budget Pick: Odoland Camp Fan
If you’re still having trouble picking the best camping fan or tent fan for your next car camping trip or some other outdoor use to beat the heat, feel free to reach out to me via the comments on my YouTube channel.